Jun 30, 2016, 10:49 AM, a missive to my dearest . . . oh, better not say.
[begin message]
Dearest Harold (the Hoarder),
Jun 30, 2016, 10:49 AM, a missive to my dearest . . . oh, better not say.
[begin message]
Dearest Harold (the Hoarder),
The Writer's philosophy revolves around a deep love of knowledge characterized by careful, clear, systematic, rational, reflective, and critical thinking about fundamental ideas on any subject with the goal of understanding and wisdom. This philosophy emphasizes the highest expression as asking questions and proposing well-considered answers for right action.
The Writer reflects on the nature of self and consciousness, acknowledging the complexity of human experience and the importance of personal evolution through writing. Writing is seen as a form of self-therapy [sic] and exploration rather than for an audience, focusing on identifying and clarifying thoughts as they appear in consciousness.
There is also a recognition of the challenges posed by mechanical and staunch adherence to beliefs without awareness, which the Writer fears could hinder cultural progress and saner choices in society.
Ultimately, the Writer values shared humanity, hopefulness, and the potential for learning, growth, and creating a more just and equitable world despite the complexities and messiness of life.
If you believe all of that--about me, this voice--you will err. What do others, even AI in this instance, based on reading 50 posts to this blog, know? Not enough. Not the whole person. Not even what the Writer is hiding by not addressing, e.g., his/her dark side, and regrets (i.e., faults/errors).
So no, do not believe everything you read, and let not words represent the person you think you know.
"No other is privy to who I am," said God. Same goes for mortals.
ANSWER: No, that phraseology isn't quite correct. You have a redundancy with "the way how."
You should use either:
- "I like the way it looks"
- "I like how it looks"
Both express the same meaning, but using "the way how" together is redundant. The corrected sentence would be:
- "I like the way it looks like (something)" or
- "I like how it looks like (something)"
The "like" at the end is fine if you're comparing it to something specific.
[Caught--AI not thinking again. Humans are still better at it.]
QUESTION: Would this be another alternative? I like what it looks like.
ANSWER: Yes, "I like what it looks like" is definitely another correct alternative!
So you have three good options:
"I like the way it looks"
"I like how it looks"
"I like what it looks like"
She sat swiping across the screen,
I stood behind, I think unseen.
Fashions flickered before her eyes,
no thing her peerage would despise.
Saw her off to catch her train . . .
hurtful to judge her un-arraigned.
I could wisely wax profound
that she was shallow unbound.
We just give seconds to know
one's unique whole self then go.
Most her moments are unseen,
never swiped on our mind's screen.
Oh, the impotent didact:
Ne'er a subject enacts our tack.
Imperfect is all our lot;
wise words out and there they rot.
Live and let live mantra be.
Yes that girl--she's . . . eye candy.
Just a blip along life's way,
enjoy or not as is your sway.
Hurt none now, they come and go . . .
loud and silent deeds we sow.
from Jan. '23
Short footnote to what I wrote about writing fiction and it's-really-about-the-writer: Recently I felt I should correspond with someone I have known for twenty plus years but have had little time to enjoy her company for almost that whole period. I didn't want to compose the email message. I resisted for some reason. I wanted just to say that I had gotten and felt much older and had retreated into myself and had regrets for times lost to us, to me. Would I get another chance in this life or the next?
So I had the idea of forwarding a link to a story I wrote last year. I felt that it reflected all the above and that I had taken refuge in writing and living in imaginary/better worlds. Upon careful reading, she could see who I am today and know basically what had become of me.
I made the case in another short piece I wrote some years ago that if you read a work, any work, and gave it deep and thorough reflection, you would find all the wisdom of the ages contained therein. I don't suppose anyone else feels or thinks that way about writing and worlds within worlds that are revealed, but no matter. Except to say that this idea or hypothesis was behind what I was thinking of doing, just sending a link to something I had written which I liked a lot and thought it told my story as I would like to be known and remembered.
On a very obvious level, everything written reveals what the writer is concerned with, had wondered about, etc. This is not the deep stuff but what everyone can see by reading and reflecting on who must have written that. Oh, he thinks there is an unseen world of ideal forms, or gosh, it's like that living in a racist community, etc.
The written is part of the newsy autobiography of the writer, and the reader can begin to construct the biography through careful and thoughtful reading. As to whether that matters or that we would have an insight into other, deeper stuff, well, that is for the critics and would-be bright ones, who really, most of the time, don't know what they are talking about. Or more accurately, one moves from what we know the writer knows and cares about to conjectures which go beyond the evidence of the text and known biographical details of the writer.
So in the end, the text shows itself and something of the writer, but we'd best leave it at that and avoid the error of conjectures, i.e., gossip, and stick with what we can be pretty sure about.
I don't know today, June '25, who the person was that I thought about contacting, and I am lost as to what I wrote that brought these (above) strings of words on. But the thesis and hypotheses continue to occupy my thoughts from time to time.
As do some personal conclusions that I also deem universal.
Example: Take a quote from Rushdie's Satanic Verses, or any other book you find, and see if it doesn't lead you endlessly toward insights and revelations you thought were more properly a part of some sacred text you are more acquainted with. I think of the dictionary that way, one thing always leads to another.
While I wax thus, truths here discovered while you were unaware of me and all these endless words trying to sort out life and living:
1. All speech is political, even this that you are reading, as well as whatever you have not seen or heard, present, past or future.
2. If you get the girl by befriending her friend, the friend you will cast aside once you have attained your desire.
3. You can share your deepest and most intimate thoughts with an animal, dog in my case, and it will feel like you have earned forgiveness and reached understanding. People can't give you that.
4.
5.
(Aside with sorrow as I ponder for more) I should have been a hack literary theorist at least and not this pussy faux-philo fragmatist.
I retrieved this from my catch-all folder of draft writings.
It would be . . . accurate to say that the individual-phenomenological and the physical-biological give rise to a suspicion that there are origins for being and being aware of how things are separately and connectedly. And that the cultural and systemic inform and energize such inklings. And it would be more honest to say that each of these perspectives can be misguided and are often wrong. We know little to nothing. Pea-sized brains, or capacities? I vote that is our condition and motivation to make up stories. For it is all about stories, isn't it? A story about what I experienced. A story about what is what and whether an effect has a cause. A story we tell ourselves about who we are and where we come from. A story about wholes and parts and how they relate, and what motives there may be behind the things that we think we see and understand. All stories.
Really not knowing the author, I asked a chatbot (AKA AI), was the quote from some published work?
The passage you shared does not appear to be a direct quote from a widely known source (such as a published book, article, or famous figure), based on current databases and literary corpora. It reads more like original philosophical or reflective writing, possibly from an individual thinker, essayist, or someone engaged in existential or epistemological reflection.
Its style is informal but intellectually rich, combining phenomenological, epistemological, and narrative themes—the kind of content you might find in personal essays, blog posts, or spoken monologues rather than academic or canonical works.
If you found it somewhere specific (like a blog, journal, or lecture), it's possible it's authored by a lesser-known thinker or someone self-publishing ideas. If you wrote it yourself or are considering using it in writing, it's quite thought-provoking and stylistically distinctive—definitely in the realm of original writing unless you have strong reason to believe it's been quoted from someone else.
Ha, hiding in a computer file. Genius sometimes doesn't recognize itself.
However, appearing along with the above re-discovered fragment was this from Matthew Arnold's Culture and Anarchy.
The whole scope of the essay is to recommend culture as the great help out of our present difficulties; culture being a pursuit of our total perfection by means of getting to know, on all the matters which most concern us, the best which has been thought and said in the world, and, through this knowledge, turning a stream of fresh and free thought upon our stock notions and habits, which we now follow staunchly but mechanically, vainly imagining that there is a virtue in following them staunchly which makes up for the mischief of following them mechanically.
I am afraid these days about what the staunch and mechanical followers with pea-sized brains are up to. I believe culture and the best which has been thought and said will not turn the tide. Nor will instinct help anyone gain greater awareness enough to make saner choices and change false and malicious stories relied upon as actionable.
I doubt I'll see the day the clock is re-set to tell of better times.
After my first heart attack and second wife's departure, and after having had extra-ordinary experiences, caused I suppose by trauma and spiritual practice and instruction, I visited my sister, and in the course of keeping her company as she went about her workday, we met someone she knew. I wasn't introduced but had a kind of clarity of seeing as I took in the image of this person, as if my perception enveloped her. Facing me, her body head to foot became one for me including the line of her profile plus a few inches, not an aura-light or that kind of thing. She was this cutout object, as it were, and it stood out such that all the rest of the place disappeared and I saw only this, and my feeling was that I was seeing this as-suchness and through this suchness, around her to the limits of her physical self plus profile from behind. I asked my sister who this person was. She told me someone I didn't want to know, she had unspecified problems. I said without thinking that I had seen through her to the limits of her presence, as if I was seeing something like some mystical person might. At the time and upon reflection I don't know what I experienced and what or why I even said this. It must have sounded strange or some kind of fabrication or prelude to being captivated by this person, getting to know who she was. She had an effect on me, unmistakable. But to this day I have never again had such a kind of seeing through comprehensively like this, a physical not metaphysical thing. I suspect it was not her but me doing something. Perhaps it was an awkward expression in a moment as a result of months of silence and suffering and trying to connect again with the world. I don't know.
---
It is impossible to know another person, that is to know him or her fully inside and out. Of course, we say we do, after some time and experience of and with that person; but that isn't even the half of it. Others can tell us about our person of interest. But these are isolated stories, snippets from a life lived and perceived in parts by others. And what do they really know?
How can we access more of what we would like to know? And what would the person you are interested in like you to know about him or her?
I suspect some of that more that we would know could come from media--print and other media, perhaps like film or recordings. And what would these capture? In my case: Words. Perhaps lots and lots of what the subject-person said or fixed in media that we can visit and re-visit to try to say, in the end, hey, I really knew them, perhaps more than anyone else would care to know.
Finding out who I am, or was, is through words. I have left them here and there. A place to start is here.
Do they expect I shall be
their image fixed of this street?
Such to minds privy discreet?
It can be other surmise.
Thus alone, I'm no way wise,
able to guess or to know
the looks that goad us to glow.
I wait, wandering in lies:
What's in the light or their eyes,
that wordless passing must sate?
Stay here and wait for my mate.
Yet of s/he or me inside
would out but never betide?
When in Australia earlier this year, I devoted local library time to reading Paradise Lost by John Milton. I almost made it to the final book (aka chapter) by the time I returned home in February, and admit now I have but one book to go.
Upon my return, two of my online English conversation partners--students working on language proficiency through conversation, as I try to extend and expand their knowledge, skills, etc.: They wanted to discuss religion and the Bible, and through that gain greater range of expression, fluency in speaking and better language comprehension. So be it, although one student needed re-direction, having thought conversation was (my) conversion.
Apropos of the above and the fact each student wanted to discuss the book of Genesis first, I went to King James and began reading. (Students give earnest teachers homework.) The reading was enlightening. I again recalled that the word of God, a book of books, required endless effort by scholars and in my case Catholic sermonizers to understand, that is interpret, what he or He "wrote." Now I get it, the it being the necessity to discern meanings through tireless effort and acquired expertise to arrive at what that sacred text proffers.
Milton does the best God's-word rendition of Genesis, and I will read and re-read Paradise Lost and more from his opus. Us mortals can never fully understand and appreciate what he, a blind genius, accomplished, to wit: A masterful, compelling poetic and learned interpretation, that is re-telling, of the Genesis story. Paradise Lost cannot be surpassed in my view, so worth more time to savor and learn and appreciate as much as I can.
As for King James, the first lines of Genesis already are up for alternative readings. Then we have God creating man and the injunction to multiply and rule over beasts and bower. Woman comes off, as in Milton's take, not very well or good. Such a sorry history and legacy and burden for our better halves. Then after creating man, woman and families, He, God according the the narrator, comes around to Adam then Eve and the (very) first commandment--not to know good from evil. If you violate this injunction, you (Adam) and your descendants are condemned to death (Milton's gloss on death is helpful here).
What? All was blissful ignorance and then not so because of particular knowledge? and for this one transgression, to be more fully coincident with the image of God, as He was reported to have made us, we must suffer in this imperfect world? or eternally somewhere warmer, forever and ever?
Why if the good book is God's word, and concerning the Bible my students say every word is His and true, did He write such that there are questions, ambiguities, cruelties, childish admonitions, contradictions, threats, unreasonable dictates, unrealistic or ill advised behavior toward hostile others, etc. Surely He could have done better, which seems to prove these days that He is a he and not She.
The enterprise of mandatory and endless interpretation of the book-of-books looks more like a hodgepodge of old cultural artifacts cobbled together to keep us busy . . . differing in view among one another and worse. And this inevitable conclusion from the very first sentences of the sacred book.
So. Nice story, or stories, that can be better told in more gifted hands I believe.
No. Here's a better idea. I'll continue with Milton and at the same time regularly pay obeisance to Shakespeare. Clearer writing, richer descriptions and characterization, better, more engaging stories all promising less ambiguous understanding of the message(s) and me and my provincial corner of this now (always was) imperfect paradise.
__________
* Dedicated to friend and teacher, Dr. Michael Russo. May we meet again to share insights and discern truths in a world better suited to us. "In light of the above, I believe your dear S. fits as one of the few almost fathomable interpreters of God's word, but can we read and understand what S. wrote?" You may be the only one to make that claim that yes. . . .
[No. It took me another 20 years, but that's another story which will never be told, at least not here.
Scanned and OCR rendered from an end-of-year communication to family and friends, probably 1993 or '04.
Who was I then? the same today?
Tamper not, again, with history.
And excuse my not cleaning up what the software and scanning didn't get exactly. But you'll get the idea.]
For my I part cannot end the year without writing . . . and sharing a few thoughts with you, one OF a SMali Number OF very Special: people.
This year has been one of turmoil with moments of relative calm, and some healing. And I have shared parts or all of me with you under what have been for me very special and extraordinary circumstances. Many have seen how very human and frail I am. Others have witnessed glimpses of what I can be like in happier times. A few have looked into my unconscious and have not laughed. A couple I have let touch my soul. Some just touched it anyway--permission I granted without your asking. And I am glad for this, all of this.
I am not who I was nor am I who I will be. I am not where I was, nor will I be here for very long. I appreciate mental, emotional, and physical health much more than I ever did. I delicately balance myself every day on an edge between correspondent sanity and the deepest abyss, the abyss I thought in former times was reserved for others.
I appreciate and am coming to acknowledge the light that draws me to my true self. Some have said I have touched them in some way. For this I am glad too. It has been my mission to live again, and the way of that mission has been love which I have tried to express, however awkwardly. Some have been startled by my directness. "I love you" is not casual talk, and you did not take it casually, I know. But the light heals, even if we are apart. The light is still there for us, one more chance.
I have shed tears and been mortally wounded by the pain I have witnessed that others bear. This has not served me as well as it should since the counterbalance has been missing in my life, and I must admit is still missing.
I have taken refuge in my studies, my own company, my monastic ways. The death to rebirth process has not seen itself through to fulfillment. Re-birthing is hard stuff, particularly for mythical types such as I find that Iam. Harder than anything I have ever done or contemplated. And the pain has been hell itself. I wish no one--not anyone--such pain as I have experienced, as I have caused.
I pray that what I call the cosmos embrace all of us. I can no longer read newspapers or watch TV. The suffering and ignorance and lack of compassion are so difficult to view, to know about. I have used the word excruciating, and have come to a personal conclusion that crucifixions are salvation if there is but faith and hope. Would that salvation could be without such trials. They are sufferable and transcendent as we allow ourselves to be embraced by others, by faith and hope. We each have our own ghosts and demons, our own challenges, our own sadnesses which defy comparison--this I believe. May I gather myself to move better and beyond mine. I will, as best I can. Herein is my forgiveness of others. I am coming to forgive myself and feel the embracing.
St. Francis has been guiding me. I have not given up on him. I trust he will not give up on me. Perhaps like Francis, I have had altered states of consciousness, and they have led me to slow shifts in perception and belief. The consequences of this I already feel. But I do not care that I do not care about what my culture has presented as value. I admit I am finding difficulty with the "fit." I am not closed to all the possibilities, nor do I aspire to be closed. But I know what I know, even though I cannot prove or explain. I find myself on the outside of the worldly flow, but my perspective says that only some things matter. And non-things matter the most.
Through all of this and more, you have been there, or you were there at an important moment. I have not forgotten. I am thankful. And I love you for the help you have given me. May I be there at some moment or moments when you have as great a need as I for comfort, understanding, and love. 1994 is another year, but today will never come again. I am sorry for the lost days. But in view of this day and these moments, I treasure in just thinking about you.
I trust this letter finds you well and at peace with infinite moments of joy that embrace you, and that you can embrace.
[I don't know how this document survived till today, written on what was then called Czech recycled paper, something like newspaper paper, then and now a kind of beige color. So I scanned it and put it through an OCR engine. Here is the result of three pages, untouched--as they were and are with and without OCR errors/omissions. Don't change history.
I wrote it I remember to be news from the front, so to speak, for family and friends I left in the US in 1994 and before. This letter of sorts dates from then, the fall of '94 or sometime in '95.
Who was I then? the same person as now?]
And of course, there's gossip, which is by definition laced with uncertainty.
| teach two classes which | share with another teacher. He is Rick to me, Mr. Richard Myers to his students. He teaches American English, like it or lump it. And he has told several students to lump it. Particularly the one who continues to argue with him about the fine points of grammar and the preferred ways to say things in British English, with a British accent. In fact, Frank, that is the student, has asked me to teach him British pronunciation. Frank is an elitist and condescending. We regularly speculate whether he is this way when he speaks Czech. There's no way we can really tell. Asking his classmates has not seemed like a good idea. :
Rick has a plane ticket for the 17th of this month back to the US. He threatens to use it. For a well traveled and experienced teacher of English, he is somewhat stubborn on some points. Points of English usage and grammar, of course. Another point is his cat. He travels around the world with this thing; it is first in his life.
Rick talks in the hallway until late into the evenings, with anyone who happens by. He speaks German with the German teachers, English with the English teachers, and with lots of affection to his cat which he allows out in the halls about ten or ten thirty. Rick plans his lessons for the next day after the socializing and the cat's walkabout. He finally goes to bed about two or three in the mornina.
Rick eats out everyday, once a day. He is very thin. He doesn't like to use the community kitchen because he would have to share pots, pans, plates, and utensils. So he buys very little food that he keeps in his room. McDonald's likes him very much.
Conrad, the person who was influential in getting me here to teach, is deathly afraid of dogs. Some childhood experience or other. The guard dogs downstairs are particularly frightening, and Conrad has not been happy about their presence, their barking, their walking the halls at night in the dark without muzzles or leashes. | am not very fond of this situation either. Last week's rumor was that Conrad went to the hospital for a problem which sounded like either some terminal instability or wounds from a fight. He and one of the guard dogs had had it out. Conrad had had it. He attacked the dog! | am happy to say Conrad is back at work and looks and sounds just fine.
We have foreign English teachers in two separate faculties—one faculty is business and economics and the other is a department of education. Pedagogy they call it. The teachers in these departments don't associate with each other. They don't even know each other! Those in the business and econ faculty admit they need help with teaching methodology. That is what the other faculty is doing, teaching teaching methodology. | keep asking silly questions like, why don't we have a workshop or seminar with “them"?
The head of the department (our employer) asked about what we taught during October. Again, | felt like the lone ranger. Seemed like a reasonable question from employer to employee. What have you been doing? My colleagues found the request outrageous. They proceeded to make their responses as passively and un-passively aggressive as possible. Sara has threatened to stop teaching if anyone comes into her classroom to observe. Tim has written a memo to the head of the department with the idea that she will have to use an English dictionary to find out what he has said. She is Czech and English is a second or third language for her.
| teach one student English and he tries to teach me survival Czech. He's getting the better deal. But he, Jan, is curious. He proudly announced the other day that his surname meant tit in English. This had to be sorted out straight away, and | think | did a pretty tactful job of it. Titmouse is a bird found in G.B. | remembered that. Clive, a fellow teacher and from England says they have blue tits, yellow tits, and what not in G.B. | gave Jan the proper cultural tips {with a p) for boasting in the U.S. about what his name means in the vernacular.
He wears the same clothes each time | see him. Top button of his nicely pressed shirt buttoned. He writes in miniscule fashion from the top edge of the page to the bottom
[This effort was inspired by what my granddaughter said, or perhaps Lola herself in early 2025. The word-salad is not addressed to anyone, nor is it autobiographical.*]
"I love you. Go 'way," she said ta the dog.New Year's resolutions gets a bad rap,
'cause January's end opens the gap.
What energy was when first they was made,
gives way to things now duty-new evade.
A resolve's difficult to keep on track
with all life's diverts sure keep full the sack.
Not just that but most we useless do prove.
Hard it is to keep good 'nd true our groove.
So come it will when at this first month's end,
I'll keep resolve, dismiss the dross and rend
all that stuff that begs us tend, and please spend,
and asks to bend an ear, 'Be sure attend.'
I'll up and say, 'Look at me, this to see:
Better to live and just let my self be.'
Most or all that crap takes our precious time,
Must avoid all these matters for sublime.
Thus I'll have my days my own. Off, flip it.
Live the good life; best ignore (more) B. S.
Jun 30, 2016, 10:49 AM, a missive to my dearest . . . oh, better not say. [begin message] Dearest Harold (the Hoarder), Thank you for your ...